More Companies Want SCIF Work. Vet Them Like It Matters.
The push to modernize secure space has brought something with it: a lot of new companies. New general contractors, new RF shielding installers, new door and waveguide suppliers, new consultants, new manufacturers with polished spec sheets. Some of them will be very good. Many of them are learning on your project.
The hard part is that they don't sound inexperienced. They know the vocabulary. They can talk about ICD 705, perimeter construction, and RF attenuation with confidence. But confidence is not the same as having built, tested, and accredited these spaces, and the difference usually shows up after the contract is signed.
Here is what we're seeing, and how vetting SCIF contractors and suppliers protects your project.
Experience claims that don't hold up
We recently reviewed a contractor's qualifications that claimed a very large number of completed secure facility projects. We had worked alongside that same contractor on their most recent job. What we saw in the field was not the work of a team that had done this dozens of times. The sequencing, the coordination with the SSM, and the handling of penetrations all pointed to a team still finding its footing.
The claim may have been technically defensible depending on how you count. That's the problem. "Projects" can mean anything from a full SCIF build to a single door installation inside someone else's SCIF.
What to do:
Ask for a project list that states what the company actually did on each job, not just the facility name.
Ask whether each space accredited on the first attempt, and how many deficiencies came out of the pre-accreditation inspection.
Call the references. Actually call them. Ask what went wrong and how the company handled it, and ask if they would hire them again.
Ask who will be on your job. Experience lives in people, not logos. The superintendent and project manager assigned to your project matter more than the company's total project count.
Spec sheets that don't match the test data
We've had product data submitted that claimed one level of performance while the test report attached to it showed something lower. Sometimes the test was on a different configuration than the one being proposed. Sometimes it covered a narrower frequency range than the spec sheet implied. Sometimes there was no test report at all, just a confident number.
For RF components, that matters because the space will be tested as installed, and the number on a brochure won't change what the test shows. A door or waveguide that underperforms becomes the weak point in the whole enclosure, and finding that out at final testing is the most expensive time to learn it.
What to do:
Ask for the actual test report, not a summary. Look at who performed the test, the method used (IEEE 299 is the common standard for measuring shielding effectiveness), the frequency range, and whether the tested configuration matches what you're buying.
Ask whether the installer has installed that specific product before, and what the as-built test results were.
Have someone independent compare the submittal to the project's RF requirements before it is approved.
Where the product comes from matters
We've seen RF products recommended on secure facility projects that were made by Chinese companies. That isn't going to work. On most programs, a foreign-sourced component in the shielding system, particularly one from China, will not survive review by the AO or CTTA, and it shouldn't. For cameras and telecommunications equipment, federal contracting rules under Section 889 of the FY2019 National Defense Authorization Act already prohibit certain Chinese manufacturers outright.
What to do:
Ask every supplier for country of origin and the location of manufacture, not just where the company is headquartered.
Ask about ownership. A domestic brand name doesn't guarantee domestic manufacturing.
Raise supply chain questions with your AO and CTTA early, before the product is in the specification, not after it is on site.
Vetting SCIF contractors and suppliers is part of security, not just procurement
It's easy to treat contractor and supplier selection as a purchasing decision. On secure facility work, it's also a security decision. The companies you bring onto the project shape what gets built into the walls, what gets tested, and whether the space accredits.
The good news is that experienced teams welcome these questions. They have the project lists, the references, and the test reports ready, because they've been asked before. If a company gets uncomfortable when you ask for proof, that tells you something too.
If you'd like a second set of eyes on a contractor's qualifications or a product submittal before you commit, that's the kind of review we do as part of our Pursuit Support and Validation + Advisory work. Or you can reach out and Talk to an Expert.
Comments